Reviewer Acknowledgement

Zainal Abidin, Islamic University of Madura, Indonesia

Wiwik Utami, Mercu Buana University, Indonesia

Achsania Hendratmi, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Azharsyah Ibrahim, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Ai Nur Bayinah, State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Hery Purwanto, University Cendikia Mitra Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Ade Yuliar, State Islamic University Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

Muhamad Zen, State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Emi Puspita Dewi, State Islamic University Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia

Muhammad Alan Juhri,  State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

Ihsan Rahmat, State Islamic University of Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Indonesia

Robby Aditya Putra, State Islamic Institute of Curup Bengkulu, Indonesia

Chasan Ma'ruf, STAI Publisistik Thawalib Jakarta, Indonesia

Ari Prabowo, University Potensi Utama Medan, Indonesia

Randi Tamirano, State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Rohman, Ummul Quro Islamic University of Bogor, Indonesia

IT SUPPORT

M. Alim Akbar, Tipataha Creative Agency, Indonesia

Peer reviewers should :

  1. Only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner.
  2. Respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal.
  3. Not use information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other person's or organization's advantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others.
  4. Declare all potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if they are unsure whether something constitutes a relevant interest
  5. Not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors.
  6. Be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory and from making libelous or derogatory personal comments.
  7. Acknowledge that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavor and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner
  8. Provide journals with personal and professional information that is accurate and a true representation of their expertise
  9. Recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process is considered serious misconduct